I am waiting for the Lazy Disciple's repartee on my recent comments on how to call the founder of Islam and why.
I know in fact that, while in agreement with the general intent of what I said, he doesn't agree with my granting Muhammad the title of "prophet".
I tried to explain in the last post the why of a possible granting of that title to that man: everybody is a "prophet" for that in whose name he is claiming to speak.
Probably, by saying so, I strand away from the current use of the word, to which we should after all stick, if we don't want to engender confusion.
The trouble is that confusion is already there in our current use of words. Taking words – like prophet – in their simple etymological meaning, is just a way to befuddle the reader, inviting, nay, provoking him to question the current use.
Who knows, it might help to make some clarity and dispel the present confusion!